<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
<title>REV RSS</title><link>http://www.revmag.com/index.html</link><description>Hot News&#x21;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><dc:rights>&#xa9; 2011 Henry S. Harrison</dc:rights><dc:date>2012-05-29T12:07:33-04:00</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" /><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:18:49 -0500</lastBuildDate><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-05-29T12:07:33-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/5_29_12.html#unique-entry-id-188</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/5_29_12.html#unique-entry-id-188</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Scope of Work - Special Requirements</span><br />Dear H2,<br /><br />I have a client that is asking for an enormous amount of data research for review assignments and they are very specific about the order in which these items are to be placed in the report.  I am concerned about data mining from my reports but wanted to get your thoughts. <br /> <br />Some of the items that they are requesting are a 0-6 month CMA of all applicable sales in a marketing area and a 6-12 month CMA of all applicable sales in a marketing area.  I am okay about providing some of these items but then they also want both the MLS sheets and County records of <strong>all of the sales</strong> from the CMA.  In some neighborhoods, we may be talking upwards of 50 or more sales in both CMAs -- which then may add upwards of 200 additional pages to the report.  They want each one on an individual page and labeled very specifically as to what they are, so the additional amount of work that is being asked for each Review Assignment is extensive. <br /> <br />Any thoughts on how I can appropriately address these additional requests?<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Thank you.<br />Cathy Putegnat<br />Homestead Appraisals<br /><a href="mailto:info@homesteadappraisalsinc.com" rel="self">info@homesteadappraisalsinc.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Cathy,<br /><br />The USPAP requires that appraisals be reported in one of three different types of appraisal reports. Most residential appraisals are Summary Appraisal Reports but it sounds like from your question that your client may be asking for a Self Contained Appraisal Report in their scope of work requirements. The first step in the required scope of work dialogue between the appraiser and the client is to agree upon which type of report is required. The USPAP specifies the minimum that is required for each report type, but the client and the appraiser can agree on any additional material the lender/client requests.  <br /><br /> I once did a 25 mile pipeline right-of-way "taking" appraisal where we were asked to provide information about every sale in the past 10 years that took place within a mile of the proposed right-of-way. It was a great assignment because our fee was in the six figures and the client agreed to pay half of it 'up front' so that we could  pay for the additional appraisers used to do the extensive research. By the way, this client also had a standard format for reporting each sale. The only problem I can see here is whether you are going to be adequately paid for all of the extra work involved, assuming you are willing to do what they request.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Breaking News</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>News</category><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-06-02T12:07:31-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/6_2_12.html#unique-entry-id-186</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/6_2_12.html#unique-entry-id-186</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"><a href="http://www.alamode.com/appraiser/mobile/" rel="external"><img class="imageStyle" alt="alamode" width="380" height="520" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry186-alamode.jpg" /></a></div><span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Appraisal Qualification Board  Q & A Vol.4, No.1</span><br />Dear Henry,<br />	I am now considering up grading from a Certified Residential Appraiser to General Certified Appraiser.  I get different answers from different people on several of the requirements.  For example some people tell me my upgrade work must be supervised by a General Certified Appraisers.  Others tell me it is unnecessary.  My state appraisal board says it depends what is required by the Appraisal Foundation.  I have tried to real all their voluminous requirement but can not find a definitive answer to the question.  What do you think.<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Sincerely,<br />OJ<br />Madison, WS<br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear OJ<br />You are correct when you say there is no direct definitive answer to this question in the USPAP. There is an answer in the just released Appraisal Qualification Board  Q & A Vol.4, No.1 dated June 2012.<br /><br />This is a summary of what it says:<br /><br />1.  Some states have specific requirements that cover this situation.  Therefore the first then than any appraiser who is considering getting a Residential or General Certification is to check with your state to see what their specific requirements are.  The simplest way to do this is to send them a letter asking what if any requirement you state has.  I always prefer a letter to a verbal request as if some time in the future what you have done is questioned you can fall back on the letter to explain what you did or did not do.  The only problem with this communication method is that some states take a very, very long time to answer appraiser inquiry letters.  If this apply to you state you should make a verbal inquiry and when you get someone who will talk to you ask them if they have anything in writing that they can send to you.<br /><br />The entire AQB  Q & A Vol.4, No.1, June 2012 is available to download by <a href="http://www.revmag.com/resources/AQB_QA_2012-06.pdf" rel="external">clicking here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-05-31T12:07:30-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/5_31_12.html#unique-entry-id-185</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/5_31_12.html#unique-entry-id-185</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">UAD vs. USPAP?</span><br />Dear H2,<br /><br />Why are some appraisers claiming that the UAD fails to meet USPAP?<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Robert O'Brien <br /><a href="mailto:obrienconsultants@gmail.com" rel="self">obrienconsultants@gmail.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Robert,<br /><br />So far no one has sent me a valid reason why complying with the UAD would require an appraiser to make an appraisal that does not meet the requirements of the USPAP. I do not know who has been making these claims, but I don't think they are valid.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH</em></strong><br /><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Editorial</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Editorial</category><dc:date>2012-06-03T12:07:30-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/6_3_12.html#unique-entry-id-184</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/6_3_12.html#unique-entry-id-184</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font:18px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">When Will the Residential Real Estate Recession End?</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><em><br /></em></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">  Soon, later or never? I predict it will last beyond the term of whomever is elected president this fall.<br /> <br />In 2005, my neighbor, the Yale economist Robert Shiller, predicted in &ldquo;Irrational Exuberance, 2nd Edition&rdquo; that the Housing Bubble would soon burst. He was called Dr. Doom in the media, and ignored by most people, especially those in government who might have done something to avert the pending crisis.   <br /><br />The bubble did not burst all at once, as in a stock market crash, but rather, values fell more gradually in some markets and much faster in others, proving once again that there is no "national" real estate market in the country, but rather many different markets, each highly dependent upon location (location, location, location).<br /><br />Now we are coming up to a national election in the fall of 2012 and we keep hearing murmurs that the end is in sight. This may be true in some localities, like the San Francisco Bay area, but I believe it is wishful thinking in most places in the United States. During 2011, over a million houses were actually foreclosed or sold via short sales. Almost double that number entered into the foreclosure process. The current slow down in foreclosures is not due to the improved economy but rather to a slow down caused by the courts, who are now insisting that the foreclosure documents be legally correct. (Revelations of widespread fraud in document preparation has led to what is probably a temporary reprieve for many homeowners who are currently under water.) There are now about 100 million detached single family homes in the United States of which nearly 15 million are underwater. Furthermore millions of them are vacant.<br /><br />Here is my own experience, which I believe is typical for Florida and many other parts of the country. The house that we purchased three years ago was built in 1995, at a cost including the site of about $225,000. At its peak in 2005, it was worth about $375,000. We bought it for $130,000 and today it would sell for about $110,000. The cost to build it today would be about the same as in 1995, that it, about $225,000. In our solvent 55+ development with nearly 800 units, about 10% of the houses are on the market. This figure has been constant for the past three years, because as fast as houses are being sold, others come on the market. There are practically no new houses being built in our market area. And there is nothing on the horizon that I can see that is going to significantly change this picture in the near future.<br /><br />I know two families whose homes have been in foreclosure for over a year. Neither of them make any payments on their mortgage, or pay any taxes. If they were served papers today, it would take six months to a year to actually foreclose their homes and get them out. The lender would then have to fix up the houses, which both have deferred maintenance, and will likely take a 25% to 50% loss on both properties. Their neighbors who have been making their payments all along feel like fools whenever they learn that a delinquent homeowner is not only not being foreclosed on, but often having their mortgage renegotiated with more favorable terms. It makes those folks who are "playing by the rules" feel duped by the system.<br /><br />I don&rsquo;t see any quick fix to this problem. What will happen if the government forces the banks to "write down" the mortgages for delinquent homeowners &mdash; and doesn't do something similar for those people who've been making their payments all along, even though the value of their home has fallen below the unpaid amount of their mortgage?<br /><br />I know from what I hear first hand and read that these two examples are duplicated in millions of situations throughout the country. When the bubble burst, those of us who predicted it would take at least 10 years for a recovery were accused of being "gloom and doomers." I predict that in 2015, we will be thought of as too optimistic!<br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Article</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Article</category><dc:date>2012-05-30T12:07:30-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/5_30_12.html#unique-entry-id-183</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/5_30_12.html#unique-entry-id-183</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font:19px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">How to Appraise in a Declining Market</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><em>An Analysis by Henry S. Harrison, MAI, SRPA, ASA of<br />APB Valuation Advisory #3: Residential Appraising in a Declining Market</em></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "> <br />The Appraisal Practices Board (APB) of the Appraisal Foundation has just released &ldquo;APB Valuation Advisory #3 &ndash; Residential Appraising in a Declining Market&rdquo; dated May 7, 2012. This 33 page document is available at the Appraisal Foundation Website: www.appraisalfoundation.org  (When you land on their Homepage, single click on the left side column &ldquo;Appraisal Practices Board (APB)&rdquo; ; and then single click on &ldquo;APB Valuation Advisory&rdquo; and then on &ldquo;APB Valuation Advisory #3.&rdquo;) <br /><br />The most frequent question I&rsquo;ve received in my &ldquo;Ask Henry&rdquo; mailbox over the past few years is &ldquo;How does an appraiser make an appraisal of a property in a declining market?&rdquo; The majority of these questions come from residential appraisers and express their confusion as to how to include (or not include) consideration of distressed sales, short sales, foreclosure sales, etc. &mdash; and if such comps are to be used, how they should be adjusted. I will address these problems in more detail as I summarize and comment on the eight subjects that make up the Valuation Advisory #3.<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">I. How Should an Appraiser Define a Declining Market?</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br />Since there is no universally accepted definition of a declining market, it is incumbent upon the appraiser, when they report that the subject property is in a declining market, to include in the appraisal a definition of the term &ldquo;Declining Market.&rdquo; Support must be presented that demonstrates that the subject market area fits the provided definition. <br /> <br />For example, you might say: &ldquo;A declining market is one where the median house prices go down for two consecutive 3-month periods.&rdquo; To use this definition, you would then have to supply the necessary data about median sale prices in the subject market, showing that they have gone down during the past two 3-month periods. Keep in mind that an appraisal is based on historic information and is not a forecast of future conditions. It is not good appraisal practice to forecast the market direction or trend for the subject market into the future.<br /><br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Article</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Article</category><dc:date>2012-06-01T12:07:30-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/6-1-12.html#unique-entry-id-182</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/6-1-12.html#unique-entry-id-182</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">Citing Flawed Valuations, Bank of America Repurchases<br />$330 Million in Freddie Mortgages  </span><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#000000;font-weight:bold; "><br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br />Bank of America will pay Freddie Mac $330 million dollars to buy back allegedly flawed home loans, Bloomberg reported on May 23.<br /><br />Dan Frahm, a spokesman for the Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America, told Bloomberg that the bank has agreed to the repurchase &ldquo;</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><em>because the valuation method used at origination did not meet the investor&rsquo;s technical requirements.</em></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">&rdquo; Frahm noted the flaws have since been repaired.<br /><br />Bank of America CEO Brian T. Moynihan is looking to mitigate further losses after incurring more than $42 billion dollars in costs related to defective home loans, Bloomberg reported. Buyers and insurers of mortgage securities have insisted on compensation for faulty debt created by Countrywide Financial Corp., which the bank purchased in 2008, at a time when the institution was the nation&rsquo;s largest residential lender.<br /><br />Freddie Mac and Bank of America announced a $1.28 billion settlement in January 2011 resulting from bad loans sold through 2008 by Countrywide. Other transactions between the entities were not included in the deal, and a portion of the loans covered by Freddie&rsquo;s latest announcement had more recent origination dates.<br /><br />Bank of America&rsquo;s backlog of pending requests for </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">refunds on shoddy loans</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "> reached a record $16.1 billion in the first quarter 2012 as the dispute widened between BOA and Fannie Mae, which ceased accepting new loans from Bank of America in January, according to the Bloomberg report.<br /><br />&ldquo;It is also unclear if this is a one-time issue or a process that will be revisited at some regular interval,&rdquo; the Barclays analysts told Bloomberg. &ldquo;Another concern would be whether similar buyouts are being considered or being implemented at Fannie Mae.&rdquo;<br /><br /></span><span style="font-size:16px; color:#E12E2F;font-weight:bold; ">Nationally Recognized Appraisal Leader Ann O'Rourke is a featured speaker!<br /></span><strong><a href="http://www.appraisalsummit.net/" rel="external"><img class="imageStyle" alt="appraisal-summit" width="640" height="198" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry182-appraisal-summit-2.jpg" /></a></strong><span style="font-size:16px; color:#E12E2F;font-weight:bold; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-02-20T11:57:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_20_12.html#unique-entry-id-180</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_20_12.html#unique-entry-id-180</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Foyers</span><br />Dear H2,<br />Would you consider houses of worship near the subject property to be external obsolescence? <br /><p style="text-align:right;">Adele Schnabel<br /><a href="mailto:adele@tuxapp.com" rel="self">adele@tuxapp.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Adele,<br />It is quite possible that anything not on the subject property &mdash; including a house of worship &mdash; could cause external obsolescence. Excess noise, traffic and other issues might ensue. It is up to you as the appraiser to assess whether or not these conditions exist and if they cause external obsolescence.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a><br /><br /></p><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://appraisalworld.com/products-and-services/collateral-valuation-report-cvr/information/" rel="external" title="bradford"><img class="imageStyle" alt="bradford_cvr_banner" width="480" height="70" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry180-bradford_cvr_banner.gif" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>News</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>News</category><dc:date>2012-02-21T11:57:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_21_12.html#unique-entry-id-179</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_21_12.html#unique-entry-id-179</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<img class="imageStyle" alt="FHFALogo_notification" width="80" height="80" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry179-fhfalogo_notification.jpg" /><span style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold; ">Federal Housing Finance Agency</span><br /><br /><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">FHFA Sends Congress Strategic Plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Conservatorships</span><br /><br /><div class="image-right"><a href="http://www.liability.com/" rel="external" title="LIA"><img class="imageStyle" alt="LIA-RE" width="380" height="720" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry179-lia-re-3-3.jpg" /></a></div>Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Acting Director Edward J. DeMarco today sent to Congress a strategic plan for the next phase of the conservatorships of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises). The plan builds on the Acting Director&rsquo;s February 2010 letter to Congress on the conservatorships and sets forth objectives and steps FHFA is taking or will take to meet FHFA&rsquo;s obligations as conservator. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorships Sept. 6, 2008 and have since received more than $180 billion in taxpayer support. <br />FHFA identifies three strategic goals for the next phase of the conservatorships: <br /><br /><span style="font:12px Monaco; ">&bull; </span><strong>Build. </strong>Build a new infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market; <br /><br /><span style="font:12px Monaco; ">&bull; </span><strong>Contract.</strong> Gradually contract the Enterprises&rsquo; dominant presence in the marketplace while simplifying and shrinking their operations; and <br /><br /><span style="font:12px Monaco; ">&bull; </span><strong>Maintain.</strong> Maintain foreclosure prevention activities and credit availability for new and refinanced mortgages. <br /><br />&ldquo;With the conservatorships operating for more than three years and no near-term resolution in sight, it is time to update and extend the goals and directions of the conservatorships,&rdquo; DeMarco wrote. &ldquo;FHFA is contemplating next steps to build an infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market that is consistent with existing policy proposals and will support any outcome of the leading legislative proposals. FHFA looks forward to working with Congress and the Administration on a resolution of the conservatorships and a comprehensive review of the nation&rsquo;s housing finance system,&rdquo; said DeMarco.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/15393/Conservatorship_Letter_2_2_10%5b1%5d.pdf " rel="external">Link to February 2010 letter</a>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-02-17T11:57:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_17_12.html#unique-entry-id-178</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_17_12.html#unique-entry-id-178</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"><a href="http://www.vaned.com/revmag" rel="external"><img class="imageStyle" alt="UAD online course" width="238" height="458" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry178-uad-course-2.png" /></a></div><span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Second Kitchen</span><br />Hi Henry!<br /><br />I have a quick question for you. <br /><br />I am doing an appraisal on an older 2-story home. The original kitchen is located on the first floor. Although the kitchen on the first floor is fully functional, the owners have done quite a bit of remodeling lately which includes installing another more elaborate kitchen on the second floor in the vicinity of a large family room. The location of this kitchen is really more ideal than the original kitchen, since it is located towards the rear of the home and has an unobstructed view of the water. There are two separate staircases leading to the second floor. I was considering allowing the newer, updated kitchen to represent the main kitchen and possibly give minimum credit for the older kitchen on the 1st floor. Hope I haven't confused things much but just wanted to run that by you. As far as resale goes, I think the newer, updated kitchen would be a strong selling point. I'm just trying to figure out the proper direction to take in the appraisal to avoid underwriter issues.<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Ben Powell<br />Powell's Appraisal Services, Inc<br /><a href="mailto:bpowell7@tampabay.rr.com" rel="self">bpowell7@tampabay.rr.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Ben,<br /><br />Many houses have second kitchens. However, you have to be careful about 2nd kitchens on the upper floors as many zoning regulations would consider this to be a conversion to a two family house. You need to check with your building inspector to find out what applies in the subject community.<br /><br />I cannot make a judgment about a house I have never seen. Generally, you have to decide how much extra value this second kitchen adds, keeping in mind that it might be an over-improvement and suffer from some functional obsolescence. <br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-02-16T11:57:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_16_12.html#unique-entry-id-177</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_16_12.html#unique-entry-id-177</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">USPAP vs FHA Requirements</span><br />Hi Henry, <br />I completed an appraisal for Lender A. Then, Lender B called and said Lender A is OK with them using my report. Now I've been notified that Lender B's underwriter wants clarification on a couple of items, such as right of way and community water.<br /><br />They don&rsquo;t want client name changed. Can I do this and stay compliant with USPAP? Thank you in advance for your advice.<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Carlene S Mathison<br />Cornerstone Appraisal<br /><a href="mailto:crnstone@comcast.net" rel="self">crnstone@comcast.net</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;"><br />P.S. I did check with Lender A and was told it is okay to do this "because it&rsquo;s an FHA assignment & FHA has mandated portability."<br /><br />Dear Carlene,<br />You are correct the FHA does permit the original lender to transfer the appraisal to a second lender under certain circumstances.  Here is a summary of this ruling: <br /><br /><strong>"Appraisal Transfer and Change of Client Name in Appraisal Report"</strong><br /><br /><em>In cases where a borrower has switched lenders, the first lender must, at the borrower's request, transfer the case to the second lender.  FHA does not require that the client name on the appraisal be changed when it is transferred to another lender.<br /><br />In accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), the lender is not permitted to request that the appraiser change the name of the client within the appraisal report unless it is a new appraisal assignment.  To effect a client name change, the second lender and the original appraiser may engage in a new appraisal assignment wherein the scope of work is limited to the client name change.  A new client name should include the name of the client (lender) and HUD.<br /><br />There are a bunch of other requirements the lenders must comply with.<br /></em><br />It is still my opinion that you are not required to do anything and in fact most anything you do will be treated as a new appraisal and you must comply with the USPAP requirements for making a new appraisal for which you should be paid.<br /><br />I think you have a choice.  Do nothing or tell lender B if they want you to do anything it will require you to make a new appraisal and you expect to be paid for it.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Article</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Article</category><dc:date>2012-02-15T11:57:58-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_15_12.html#unique-entry-id-176</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_15_12.html#unique-entry-id-176</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">Push for National Flood Insurance Extension &mdash; with Reforms</span><br />Based on material provided by <a href="http://www.PropertyCasualty360.com/" rel="external">PropertyCasualty360.com</a><br /> <br /><div class="image-right"><a href="http://www.liability.com/" rel="external" title="LIA"><img class="imageStyle" alt="LIA-health" width="380" height="720" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry176-lia-health-2.jpg" /></a></div>As of Valentine's Day, Feb. 14th, 41 signatures had been secured on a letter from senators to the Senate leadership urging prompt action on legislation reauthorizing the National Flood Insurance Program.<br /><br />At a press conference at the new Capitol Visitors&rsquo; Center, Senators John Tester (D-MT) and David Vitter (R-LA), the primary sponsors of the letter, said they would use the letter to persuade Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), the Majority Leader, and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) the Minority Leader, to put the NFIP long-term extension bill on the floor as soon as possible. Prompt action is needed because the current extension for the program ends May 31.<br /><br />The current program has been operating on last minute extensions (with some breaks in the program) since September, 2008. As noted at the press conference by Charles Chamness, president and CEO of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, the new flood season begins June 1, the day after the program expires.<br /><br />Senator Tester acknowledges that support for the bill is not the holdup; the holdup is that Senator Reid is concerned that Senator McConnell will seek to use the "must-do bill" to push through controversial provisions opposed by Senate Democrats. <br /><br />&ldquo;Senator Vitter and I are very well aware that that this possibility exists on all bills, and we will have to work hard to ensure that the bill remains as narrow as possible,&rdquo; Tester explained. Vitter added: &ldquo;For no good reason, the NFIP was shut down for 53 days in 2010&rdquo; because an extension to the program ran out. As a result, over 1,400 home closings were either cancelled or postponed. (He was citing data provided by the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.) According to officials, in 2010, the NFIP lapsed four times and flood coverage could not be purchased or renewed for a total of 53 days.<br /><br />Senator Vitter says Congress &ldquo;must take the next step and pass legislation providing a long-term reauthorization of the program&rdquo; before May 31. Also attending the meeting were officials of the Heartland Institute, the National Wildlife Federation, American Insurance Association, Taxpayers for Common Sense, American Rivers, NAMIC and RAA. All are supporting the effort to have the Senate act promptly on reauthorization legislation.<br /><br />The Senate bill has no name. The House bill, H.R. 1309, the &ldquo;Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011,&rdquo; passed last July by an overwhelming majority. The bill, sponsored by Representative Judy Biggert, (R-IL), would, among other provisions, extend the NFIP until Sept. 30, 2016. The Senate Banking Committee moved a similar bill "to the floor" in early September 2011. However, floor action has been pending since then. The letter was written to encourage movement on the reauthorization prior to the May 31st deadline.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-01-21T10:51:37-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_21_12.html#unique-entry-id-175</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_21_12.html#unique-entry-id-175</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Foyers</span><br />Dear H2,<br />In a reassessment, is a foyer considered to be a room? Thank you for any input you may have.<br /><p style="text-align:right;"><em>William Kalif</em><br /><a href="mailto:wkutopia@yahoo.com" rel="self">wkutopia@yahoo.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear William,	<br />In most areas of the country, a foyer is not counted as a room. If in your market area it is customary to do so, however, you should follow the custom.  In order not to confuse the reviewers, you should explain in a comment the reason you included it.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a><br /><br /><a href="http://appraisaltool.net/" rel="external"></p><p><img class="imageStyle" alt="Pasted Graphic 2" width="568" height="189" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry175-pasted-graphic-2.jpg" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-01-18T10:51:37-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_18_12.html#unique-entry-id-174</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_18_12.html#unique-entry-id-174</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Functional Obsolescence, GLA</span><br />Henry, <br />Subject is a purchase marketed as 3,100 sq.ft.  County has subject listed as 2,059 sq.ft.   Appears subject possesses a finished upper level, apparently original and legal, which does not possess a bathroom. <br /><br />I presume, at a minimum, that there is functional obsolescence?  However, presuming the upper level is legally finished and otherwise of good quality, it's hard to compare to other properties with 3,000  sq.ft. that offer greater utility.  Would you give partial value to upper level and not include in sq ft calculations?<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Thanks<br /><em>Rick Bacich </em><br /><a href="mailto:rickbacich@ssctv.net" rel="self">rickbacich@ssctv.net</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;"><br />Dear Rick,<br />It is not possible for me to give advice about specific properties.  However, here are some thoughts that may be helpful. It is up to you to determine what the actual GLA is and use it as a basis for your appraisal.  This is a separate problem from estimating what the value is. From what you say I see no reason not to include the upper area in the GLA. However you can give it less value than other parts of the house. You must make this judgment based on what is expected in your market area. You must describe what is causing a loss of value (if any) due to functional obsolescence.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2012-01-15T10:51:37-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_15_12.html#unique-entry-id-173</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_15_12.html#unique-entry-id-173</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Final Utilities Inspection</span><br />Dear Henry<br />I'm a huge fan of your articles and Q and A for a long time.<br /> <br />I&rsquo;ve been asked by a lender to do a "final inspection" on a HUD resale for just the utilities hookup. The original appraisal was done a few months ago by a different appraiser for a different client. The new lender (my client) is asking specifically that only the utilities be checked.  Can I do that? And what form would I use (all the standard forms imply that the appraiser doing the final inspection is the one that did the original appraisal).  Any suggestions on what form might protect me from being tied to the original appraisal?<br /> <br /><p style="text-align:right;">Thanks!<br /><em>Paul Ryan </em><br /><a href="mailto:paulgryan@cox.net" rel="self">paulgryan@cox.net</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Paul,<br />It does not make any difference what form you use (or maybe just a letter) as long as it is crystal clear that you are not making an appraisal or rendering any opinion as to what affect the connection of the utilities will have on the value of the property.  If you give such an opinion, you are making an appraisal and must conform to all the USPAP requirements for making an appraisal. <br /><br />Thanks for your kind comments.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Announcement</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Announcement</category><dc:date>2012-01-20T13:58:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_20_12.html#unique-entry-id-172</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_20_12.html#unique-entry-id-172</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Free FHA CLASS</span><br /><p style="text-align:center;"><strong>"The FHA Appraisal" <br /> Denver, CO<br />February 23, 2012<br /></strong><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">This FREE one-day class discusses FHA appraisal requirements including Appraisal Protocol, & updates to FHA appraisal policy, and equips attendees with the knowledge to determine property eligibility. (The earlier class, on Feb. 16th, is full.)<br /> <br />This course provides a refresher for seasoned FHA appraisers, as well as provides valuable information to appraisers new to the FHA roster. Prior Registration by Feb. 20th is required, but the course is free of charge. <br /><br />Click here: <a href="http://www.hud.gov/apps/calendar/event.cfm?state=co&record=12026&scheduleID=11771&calendarID=9" rel="external">FHA Class</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>News</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>News</category><dc:date>2012-01-19T13:58:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_19_12.html#unique-entry-id-171</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_19_12.html#unique-entry-id-171</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Not too Late to Comment...</span><br />The ASB is currently considering changes for the 2014-15 edition of USPAP. All interested parties are encouraged to comment in writing to the ASB before their upcoming meeting in Savannah, GA on February 10th, 2012.<br /><br />The actual deadline for written comments is extended to March 12th, 2012. Respondents should be assured that each member of the ASB will thoroughly read and consider all comments. Comments are also invited at the ASB public meeting on Feb.10th in Savannah, Georgia.<br /><br />Written comments on this document can be submitted by mail, email or FAX.<br /> <br />Snail mail address:<br /><br />Appraisal Standards Board<br />The Appraisal Foundation<br />1155 15th Street, NW, Suite 1111<br />Washington, DC 20005 <br /> <br />Email: <a href="mailto:asbcomments@appraisalfoundation.org" rel="self">asbcomments@appraisalfoundation.org</a><br />Fax: (202) 347-7727<br /> <br />To review the current proposed changes, click here: <a href="https://appraisalfoundation.sharefile.com/d/s63557d8860146719" rel="external">USPAP COMMENT</a><br />]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Editorial</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Editorial</category><dc:date>2012-01-23T13:58:39-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_23_12_editorial.html#unique-entry-id-170</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_23_12_editorial.html#unique-entry-id-170</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">May You Live In Interesting Times...</span><br /><img class="imageStyle" alt="181" width="640" height="420" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry170-181.jpg" /><br /><br />We all probably know the playful Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times." Watching the current political gambits on TV and YouTube it certainly reminds us that we live in a new instant age. Unfortunately, at least so far, this "silly season" seems to be a lot more about entertainment than substance.  <br /> <br />The political process at the moment appears to be primarily (pun intended) a media and money circus, rather than a realistic and practical discussion of the work that needs to be done to deal with America's real problems, both economic and social.    <br /> <br />Given our current economic doldrums, and the continuing problems of unfair taxation, high unemployment, millions of Americans still without health care, and the dismal condition of our infrastructure, it's easy to become disheartened.  <br /> <br />Still, I feel that there's real hope to focus on. <br /><br />Although we are firmly part of a global economy now, America continues to be the one country that still offers the most personal opportunity, growth, innovation and success for millions of people from thousands of diverse backgrounds.  <br /> <br />We have all THE BASICS right here. Our economy is vast, responsive and solid under the current turbulence. Let's hope 2012 proves to be a year of wisdom, power and potency, for our country, its leaders...and our profession!<br /><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>News</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>News</category><dc:date>2012-01-17T13:58:39-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/1_17_12.html#unique-entry-id-169</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/1_17_12.html#unique-entry-id-169</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">~ SOPA Update ~</span><br /><br /><strong>Senators Flee Internet Piracy Bill</strong><br /> <br />Support for two online piracy bills in Congress dropped dramatically on Wednesday after opponents of the legislation staged a dramatic protest in which vast swaths of the Web effectively went dark. More than 4.5 million people signed their names to the Google petition and 300,000 people emailed or called their lawmakers, according to the protest organizers. <br /><br />In New York, San Francisco and Las Vegas, protesters held rallies to draw attention to the bills. The Library of Congress said late Wednesday that it had been hit with a denial of service attack by &ldquo;a group opposed to the online piracy legislation.&rdquo; By evening, a number of lawmakers had done an about-face on the legislation.<br /><br />The Senate version of the bill lost four of its co-sponsors, including Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). &ldquo;It is simply not ready for prime time and both sides must continue working together to find a better path forward,&rdquo; Hatch said in a statement about the Protect Intellectual Property Act.<br /><br />Senators John Boozman (R-Ark.), Mark Rubio (R-Fla.) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) also released statements Wednesday saying that they had reservations and would not vote for the bill if it came up for a floor vote. In the House, where lawmakers are considering a similar bill called the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters that &ldquo;it&rsquo;s...clear to many of us that there&rsquo;s a lack of consensus at this point&rdquo; on how to proceed with the bill.<br /><br />The online piracy bills had been aimed at protecting U.S. companies against foreign Websites that illegally post copyrighted material. Companies opposing the legislation had argued that the bills would impose heavy regulatory costs, harm innovation and give the government too much power to shut down Websites accused of copyright violations even if they are later found to be innocent of the charges.<br /><br />&ldquo;The entire approach is philosophically wrongheaded,&rdquo; said Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales last Tuesday evening in an interview with The Washington Post before the protest began. In a statement posted to his public Facebook profile, co-founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said the bills &ldquo;get in the way of Internet development.&rdquo; Google&rsquo;s chief executive, Eric Schmidt encouraged his followers on Twitter to sign Google&rsquo;s petition against the bills, calling on them to &ldquo;Defend the web!&rdquo;<br /><br />The darkened Web sites represent some of the largest properties on the Internet: Google easily has the widest reach, with 187.1 million unique visitors in December, according to data from ComScore. Wikimedia, which owns Wikipedia and other Wiki sites, and Craigslist also have broad audiences, reaching 83 million and 49.8 million unique visitors, respectively, in the same period. Reddit, which compiles links to funny stories, was visited by 4.8 million users last month. Another participant, Boing Boing, had 1.6 million visits. <br /><br />Most responsible parties agree that some kind of intellectual property protections are needed in the current "free for all" world of downloads, uploads, YouTube, Wiki and Google. Still, the anarchic values of open structure and little regulation still hold the hearts and minds of most users of the Internet who fear that by regulating anything, the nemesis of overregulation and lost integrity will ensue.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Article</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Article</category><dc:date>2012-01-14T13:58:39-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/9825ef714c22a4e86f3e01abec64808d-168.html#unique-entry-id-168</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/9825ef714c22a4e86f3e01abec64808d-168.html#unique-entry-id-168</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">Choosing Comps in a Declining Market</span><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#000000;font-weight:bold; "><br /></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Newly published guidance from the Appraisal Institute helps appraisers know when and how to use distressed sales, such as foreclosures, as comparable sales. Such knowledge is crucial in the current market where distressed sales are common, creating complex valuation challenges.<br /> <br />AI&rsquo;s Guide Note 11: Comparable Selection in a Declining Market notes: "transactions used in an appraisal assignment require adjustments for changes in market conditions."<br />      <br />The Appraisal Institute&rsquo;s Guide Note 11 says: &ldquo;A declining market will likely exhibit very little sales activity. When the sales comparison approach is necessary, but there are virtually no current sales in the market area to analyze as comps, the appraiser must: (1.) Expand the geographic area for comp search, then adjust for location as appropriate, and/or (2.) Use less recent sales, then adjust for market conditions as appropriate.&rdquo;<br /> <br />It continues: &ldquo;Appraisers cannot categorically discount foreclosures and short sales as potential comps in the sales comparison approach.&rdquo; However, due to differences between their conditions of sale and the conditions outlined in the market value definition, these might not be usable as comps.<br /><br />Further, foreclosures and short sales usually do not meet the conditions outlined in the definition of market value, the Guide Note says. A short sale or a sale of a property that occurred prior to a foreclosure might have involved atypical seller motivations (e.g., a highly motivated seller.) A sale of a bank-owned property might have involved typical motivations, so the fact that it was a foreclosed property would not render it ineligible as a comp. However, the Guide Note also points out, if the foreclosed property was sold without a typical marketing program, or if it had become stigmatized as a foreclosure, it might need to be adjusted if used as a comp. Also, some foreclosed properties are in inferior condition, so adjustments for physical condition may be needed.<br />  <br />Click </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="http://www.revmag.com/resources/AI_guidenote_11.pdf" rel="external">this link</a></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "> to download the free PDF: &ldquo;</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="http://www.revmag.com/resources/AI_guidenote_11.pdf" rel="external">Guide Note 11: Comparable Selection in a Declining Market</a></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">&rdquo;</span>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Article</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Article</category><dc:date>2011-11-14T19:06:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/11_14_11.html#unique-entry-id-167</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/11_14_11.html#unique-entry-id-167</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">2012-13 Edition of USPAP Released</span><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; color:#000000;font-weight:bold; "><br /></span><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; color:#000000;">Effective Date: January 1st, 2012 - December 31st, 2013</span><span style="font:15px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; "><br /></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; ">The Appraisal Foundation, a congressionally-authorized nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of professional valuation, announced that the 2012-13 edition of the&nbsp;Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) has been released. USPAP is the generally accepted standards of practice for the appraisal profession in the USA.<br /></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; ">&nbsp;<br />The 2012-13 edition of USPAP will be valid for two years, from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. As with the prior edition, the new edition </span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">includes the standards of professional practice for all appraisal disciplines</span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "> as well as guidance from the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) in the form of&nbsp;USPAP Advisory Opinions and USPAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;<br />Changes to the document include:<br />	&bull;	Revisions to DEFINITIONS of &ldquo;Client,&rdquo; &ldquo;Extraordinary Assumptions,&rdquo; and &ldquo;Hypothetical Condition,&rdquo; as well as a new definition of &ldquo;Exposure Time&rdquo;;<br />	&bull;	Creation of a new RECORD KEEPING RULE and related edits to the&nbsp;Conduct Section of the ETHICS RULE;&nbsp;<br />	&bull;	Revisions to Advisory Opinion 21,&nbsp;USPAP Compliance; and,&nbsp;<br />	&bull;	Revisions to STANDARDS 7 & 8: PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL, DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING.<br /><br /></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; "><a href="http://www.globalpres.com/mediasite/Viewer/?peid=ae8192ef41804f23a498bf7b30458189%20" rel="external">CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE VIDEO ON 2012-13 USPAP CHANGES</a></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br />Copies of the 2012-13 edition of USPAP are now available for purchase from the Appraisal Foundation Store at&nbsp;</span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><a href="http://www.appraisalfoundation.org/" rel="external">www.appraisalfoundation.org</a></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; ">. The 2012-13 edition of USPAP is available in printed spiral bound copy for $75 or as an electronic PDF download for $60.<br />&nbsp; &nbsp;<br />In the coming weeks, USPAP will also be available in Flipbook format and for eReaders including the iPad, Kindle, Nook and the Sony Reader.</span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2011-11-09T19:05:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/11_9_11.html#unique-entry-id-166</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/11_9_11.html#unique-entry-id-166</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Dear Henry,<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If I lease some farmland to a farming family for 99 years, how do I calculate the value of this lease? Is it just a discounted cash flow plus the reversion of the land? Or does such a long lease typically include return on and return of capital and the reversion has no value? No buildings are involved in this deal. Thanks in advance for your help.<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Don<br /><a href="mailto:apps1@compfxnet.com" rel="self">apps1@compfxnet.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Don,
&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;For all practical purposes, a 99 year lease is a sale. It is not the original lease date that counts ~ it is how long the lease has to run. &nbsp;Some states prohibit leases longer than 99 years and others say they are the same as sales. Trying to discount income for 99 years into the future, and then trying to add the present value of a reversion 99 years in the future results in a meaningless figure. Should you consider global warming (aka climate change) or that the population of the world may be 10 billion people or may be zero? &nbsp;Some appraisers take the position that some small number is needed to reflect the difference between such a lease and ownership. &nbsp;My problem is that I don't know whether it should be a plus or minus adjustment. &nbsp;In most condemnations I am familiar with, a very long lease is treated as a sale.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Books</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2011-11-12T19:05:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/11_12_11.html#unique-entry-id-165</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/11_12_11.html#unique-entry-id-165</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Facebook-Effect-Inside-Company-Connecting/dp/1439102112" rel="external"><img class="imageStyle" alt="facebook effect" width="184" height="277" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry165-facebook-effect.jpg" /></a><span style="color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; "><br /></span><span style="font-size:14px; color:#0000CC;font-weight:bold; ">The Facebook Effect: </span><span style="font-size:14px; "><em>The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World </em></span><br /> <br /><span style="color:#0000CC;"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Facebook-Effect-Inside-Company-Connecting/dp/1439102112" rel="external">READ THE FIRST CHAPTER</a></span> for <span style="color:#800000;font-weight:bold; ">FREE</span> on your iPad, Smart Phone, PC or Mac!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Letter to the Editor</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>letters</category><dc:date>2011-10-12T09:47:31-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/10_12_11.html#unique-entry-id-162</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/10_12_11.html#unique-entry-id-162</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">We Get Letters<br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; "><u>Industry Cooperation</u></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br />To the Editor: <br /><br /></span><div class="image-left"><img class="imageStyle" alt="147" width="224" height="224" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry162-147-2.jpg" /></div><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">I've tried to write to Henry Harrison on industry cooperation. He's mentioned his frustration with appraisers having conflicts with one another and within their appraisal associations. Our inability to join forces is legendary.<br /><br />I've been in the business going on 40 years and have attempted to find others that are willing to cross association lines in an effort to foster cooperation, for any number of purposes not the least of which is to guide legislation in directions favorable to the appraiser community.<br /><br />I have talked to some other pros out here in the Portland Oregon area who are willing to get involved in an information campaign to foster understanding, cooperation and unity.  We have already had praise from some legislators out here who desperately want to hear from unified Industry Coalitions.  They simply don't have time to listen to individuals who may not represent everyone.<br /><br />We need to get together on many issues that affect us all.  The appraise community is being devastated by large powerful organizations. Do you have any resources from past articles that relate to that subject? And further, would Mr. Harrison be interested in receiving progress updates or offering his support to this kind of effort?<br /></span><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Thank you,<br />Matt Gloege, Certified Res. Appraiser<br />Oregon City, OR 97045<br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="mailto:fho2@comcast.net" rel="self">fho2@comcast.net</a></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Dear Matt,<br /><br />I had a discussion with Henry about your email to me, and while we both agree that a cohesive well-represented national appraisal profession would be an excellent thing, based on our experiences over the past 40+ years, we do not see any hope that this "gang of cats" can be herded together, even if it would be very much in their best interests.<br /><br />Sadly, unlike doctors and lawyers, appraisers do not have any history of working in a unified manner on the national level that would enable them to have real political impact.<br /><br />We appreciate your efforts in advance, and wish you the best of luck.<br /><br />Yours,<br />Ruth Lambert, </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><em>Editor</em></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2011-10-18T09:47:27-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/10_18_11.html#unique-entry-id-161</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/10_18_11.html#unique-entry-id-161</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size:17px; font-weight:bold; ">Remaining Economic Life<br /></span><br />Hello Henry,<br /><br />I have an underwriter saying that the economic life needs to be included on all reports, even though the URAR form 1004 says it is needed for HUD/VA only.  Have I missed something in this regard? Thanks in advance for your time.<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Yours,<br />Dianne Mendel<br /><a href="mailto:mndcns@att.net" rel="self">mndcns@att.net </a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Dianne,<br /><br />The USPAP states that for every appraisal, the appraiser and the lender client must have a scope of work dialogue. The designers of the URAR 1004 have incorporated some of their scope of work requirements into the URAR. What the URAR is telling you is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not require that you estimate the remaining economic life while the HUD/VA does require it.  However, if the appraiser feels it is necessary in order to make a credible appraisal (which is required by the USPAP)  it should be included. What the underwriter is saying to you is that for the lender/client they represent, it is required, which is their right.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2011-10-14T09:47:27-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/11_14_11.html#unique-entry-id-159</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/11_14_11.html#unique-entry-id-159</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size:17px; font-weight:bold; ">New Lender, Old Appraisal</span><br /><br />Hi Henry,<br /> I did an FHA Appraisal for Lender A back in July. I was paid and the file was closed. I was not able to inspect the attic at the time, as the attic entrance was sealed off. This was noted in the appraisal report. Last week (3 months after my previous inspection and report) Mortgage Company B called and said they have my appraisal, the loan did not close with Lender A and they have a new lender who will accept my appraisal. However, they need me to go back to the property and inspect the attic for a fee. I refused as I completed the original assignment for Lender A and the file is closed.<br /><br />Mortgage Company B and the homeowner keep calling me to comply and do the attic inspection. I called Lender A and they said "do not inspect, this is a USPAP violation and changes the scope of work." I want to be done with this appraisal and Mortgage Company B. My questions is whether this is indeed a USPAP violation? What is the best way to handle this with Mortgage Company B and the homeowner, who both keep calling me?<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Thanks for your time,<br />Rob<br /><a href="mailto:rburkley@columbus.rr.com" rel="self">rburkley@columbus.rr.com</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Rob,<br /><br />The USPAP is quite clear that when the client changes, it requires a new scope of work dialogue and a new appraisal. There is nothing that requires you to make a new appraisal for the new client but why not do so? However, there is also nothing to stop you from making the inspection as long as it does not become part of your original appraisal report. For a new appraisal, you are permitted to use any of the data in the old appraisal as long as it was not provided to you on a confidential basis. It should be easy to update the physical description of the property, the neighborhood data, etc., and make the attic inspection which will be part of the new scope of work requirement. I suggest offering to make a new appraisal for Mortgage Company B, taking into consideration that much of data will already be available to you. You'll make the homeowner happy, and may even develop a new client.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Editorial</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Editorial</category><dc:date>2011-10-20T09:47:26-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/10_20_11.html#unique-entry-id-158</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/10_20_11.html#unique-entry-id-158</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font:16px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Editorial: Senate Debates Additional Flood Coverage<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Having just lived through Hurricane Irene, and the significant tidal flood damage done to our summer cottage in Long Island Sound from the 7 foot storm surge added to our normal high tide of 8 feet, this article struck our attention.<br /><br />The GOOD NEWS: My own experience dealing with FEMA personnel in a difficult situation has been surprising, given their less than stellar reputation.I found them to be professional, courteous and genuinely helpful. In our area of the Connecticut shoreline there was a great deal of damage, including the wash-out of many of our main access roads. Nonetheless, the FEMA adjusters showed up and did their job of assessing the damage in a timely manner.<br /><br />At issue in Congress now are new requirements for flood insurance coverage in residential and business areas near levees, dams and other flood-control structures.<br /><br />According to a report October 19th in Property Casualty 360, two Gulf-Coast senators are seeking to remove a Senate flood-insurance legislation provision requiring flood coverage in areas already protected by levees, dams or other flood-control structures. Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., and Mark Pryor, D-Ark., announced late Monday that they are seeking to have Sec. 107 of the National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Bill deleted from the proposal. The provision was included in a bill that was reported out of the Senate Banking Committee Sept. 8.<br /><br />Cochran and Pryor are raising the issue despite the fact that the Senate is working under the pressure to pass another temporary extension of the National Floord Insurance Program (NFIP), now slated to sunset Nov. 18.<br /><br />The Senate must pass a bill, then reconcile its version with a somewhat different House bill, H.R. 1309, the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2011, before that date, or NFIP will lapse.<br /><br />Seems Congress is once again playing brinksmanship with America's flood insurance program. After our recent experience, that doesn't seem wise to us.<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Summer Cottage "Pre-Irene":</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><img class="imageStyle" alt="175" width="410" height="308" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry158-175.jpg" /><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Post-Irene Damage from Tidal Flooding:</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><img class="imageStyle" alt="176" width="410" height="308" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry158-176.jpg" /><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Matt Gannon, assistant vice president of federal affairs for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, voices sympathy for the concerns of Cochran and Pryor, but adds that the Senate bill&rsquo;s Technical Mapping Advisory Council was established to address this very type of issue. But Cochran and Pryor say they are asking their colleagues to join them in signing a bipartisan letter to the banking panel asking for reconsideration of Sec. 107. This provision would have expanded required insurance coverage to &ldquo;areas of residual risk&rdquo; that are located behind levees, near dams or other flood-control structures.<br /><br />&ldquo;The NFIP must be reformed, and I believe the Senate Banking Committee has done yeoman&rsquo;s work on crafting bipartisan reform legislation,&rdquo; Cochran says. But he notes that Sec. 107 creates new flood insurance coverage mandates on families and businesses that are already protected by strong levees and dams, and believe that "the blanket approach taken in the current bill should be changed in order to ensure fair treatment for those protected properties."</span>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ask Henry</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Ask Henry</category><dc:date>2011-10-10T09:47:26-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/10_10_11.html#unique-entry-id-157</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/10_10_11.html#unique-entry-id-157</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size:17px; font-weight:bold; ">New Assignment, Prior Property<br /></span><br />Hi Henry,&nbsp;<br /><br />In my experience, when I've done estate appraisals, the date of death provided the lower value for the client. If the estate has not been settled, say for more than one year, and the value decreases after DOD, will IRS accept a current value? I've encountered a situation, in which the electricity went off during an ice storm, the oil-fired boiler (which has a reset switch to prevent a buildup of oil in the firebox was not reset by anyone when the power came back on because no one was living in the house. The pipes froze, burst, and did a tremendous amount of damage as a result of water gushing from the baseboard hotwater system. The estate is in its third, going on 4th year. What is the property way to provide an estate appraisal?<br /><p style="text-align:right;">Jack Sotack, Waymart PA<br /><a href="mailto:accent@echoes.net" rel="self">accent@echoes.net</a><br /></p><p style="text-align:left;">Dear Jack,<br />	The effective date of the appraisal is determined at the scope of work dialogue between the appraiser and the client.  There is nothing in the USPAP other than this requirement.  Often when the appraisal is made for estate work the date of appraisal is the date of the death of the owner, but not always.  Whatever the effective date of the appraisal is date that you use for the condition of the property on that date and the market at that time.<br /></p><p style="text-align:right;"><strong><em>HSH<br /></em></strong><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>BREAKING NEWS</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Announcement</category><dc:date>2011-10-09T21:51:44-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/10_9_11.html#unique-entry-id-156</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/10_9_11.html#unique-entry-id-156</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font:14px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Check out the  <br />FREE VIDEO of USPAP Changes   <br />for 2012-2013<br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br />For many appraisers, a video presentation will be the least painful way to learn about the forthcoming USPAP regulations.<br /><br />The Appraisal Foundation has announced the release of a free video on its website entitled "A Preview of Changes to the 2012-13 Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)". It is ready now.<br /><br />The video is just 23 minutes in length, and features an interview with the 2011 Chair and Vice Chair of the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB), J. Carl Schultz, Jr. and Barry Shea, respectively. A PowerPoint presentation is available for simultaneous viewing as well.<br /><br />USPAP changes discussed in this video include: <br /><br />1) Revisions to DEFINITIONS of &ldquo;Client,&rdquo; &ldquo;Extraordinary Assumptions,&rdquo; and &ldquo;Hypothetical Condition,&rdquo; as well as a new definition of &ldquo;Exposure Time&rdquo;;<br /><br />2) Creation of a new RECORD KEEPING RULE and related edits to the Conduct Section of the ETHICS RULE; <br /><br />3) Revisions to Advisory Opinion 21, USPAP Compliance; and,<br /> <br />4) Revisions to STANDARDS 7 & 8: PERSONAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL, DEVELOPMENT & REPORTING.<br /><br />A </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Mock Administrative Hearing</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "> and an audio webinar on </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Fair Value Measures</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "> are also available online from the AF's eLibrary.The Appraisal Foundation has plans to expand its eLibrary later this year with a videotaped session on</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; "> Green Buildings and their Valuation</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">, coming in late 2011. <br /><br />Click here now for the </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="http://www.globalpres.com/mediasite/Viewer/?peid=ae8192ef41804f23a498bf7b30458189" rel="external">USPAP VIDEO</a></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">. <br /> <br />Any questions? Please Contact the AF directly:<br />Paula Douglas Seidel, Executive Administrator<br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="mailto:paula@appraisalfoundation.org" rel="self">paula@appraisalfoundation.org</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a; IN STOCK &#x26; READY TO SHIP &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2012-02-06T15:09:19-05:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/2_6_12.html#unique-entry-id-116</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/2_6_12.html#unique-entry-id-116</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.realestategraphics.com/NEWimages/harrison_urar.shtml" rel="external"><img class="imageStyle" alt="New UAD Ad for BLOG" width="457" height="361" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry116-new-uad-ad-for-blog.jpg" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>WELCOME - Summer 2012</title><dc:creator>askhenryharrison@revmag.com</dc:creator><category>Welcome</category><dc:date>2012-06-04T19:10:00-04:00</dc:date><link>http://www.revmag.com/files/welcome.html#unique-entry-id-0</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.revmag.com/files/welcome.html#unique-entry-id-0</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"><img class="imageStyle" alt="6-4-12 Adobe" width="418" height="339" src="http://www.revmag.com/files/page0_blog_entry0-6-4-12-adobe-2.jpg" /></div><span style="font:19px Georgia, serif; ">Welcome!</span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Dear Friends,</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">Welcome to our Summer 2012 issue!</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">Big changes are afoot here at REVMAG.  In the coming months we will be rolling out whole new sections of the site, to better help appraisers find what they&rsquo;re looking for!<br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br />In the meantime, check out the latest "Ask Henrys", plus Henry's new Editorial, and Book Review, and breaking news for appraisers -- all in this issue.<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><em>The Blog and our newsletters are FREE to the appraisal community, and always have been. </em></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br />Our 14,000 real estate appraisal readers have shown great loyalty and interest over the more than 25 years we've been publishing REV; we really appreciate you all! <br /><br />Your continued feedback is very important to the success of our endeavors. If you are interested in writing an article for publication, please submit it via email to Ruth Lambert, our editor, at </span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="mailto:Editor@revmag.com" rel="self">Editor@revmag.com</a></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; ">.<br /><br />Thanks again for your interest in our publications!<br /></span><p style="text-align:right;"><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">HSH</span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span><span style="font:13px Georgia, serif; "><a href="mailto:askhenryharrison@revmag.com" rel="self">askhenryharrison@revmag.com</a></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; ">P.S. For information regarding advertising opportunities and FREE p.r. in our Blog and email newsletters, please click here: </span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><a href="advertise/index.html" rel="self" title="Advertise">ADVERTISING</a></span><span style="font:12px Georgia, serif; "><br /><br />*Reprinted with permission, from HOUSES: The Illustrated Guide to Construction, Design and Systems, by Henry S. Harrison</span></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel>
</rss>